Introduction to Neuroaccounting in PM Assessment

As computational neuroscience and neuroinformatics advance, it becomes necessary to introduce new methodology that should help better understand and effectively apply acquired knowledge in educational field. Most of neuroscience currently is exploring in areas of neurocomputations and synchronizations in different neuronal networks, while completely different models are available for application. Based on emergent nature of intelligence, Neuroaccounting employs integrative model of self organizing systems. While exploring objective evidence, Neuroaccounting defined by indication of subjective thresholds required for computational process to take place during unconscious and conscious intellectual activities.
It is essential to use Neuroaccounting in implementation of Persuasive Manipulation for Assessment (PM Assessment). While it might have some risk of abuse, such risk is not greater than any influence from social interactions. Ericksonians use some elements of Neuroaccounting for inducing during therapy sessions. Most distinctive commonality there is indirect and accommodating approach with possibility of some confusion techniques involved. The key is a learning experience on both sides of the communication. That places Persuasive Manipulation on the list very effective educational methods.
Neuroaccounting is the measurement, processing, and communication of information about ability of the mind to come to correct conclusions and solve problems or understand solutions for identical issues and learn the ways of self-adjustments. It is important to distinct emotional responses, rational (analytic) mental processes, creative potential, and socially acquired (adopted) stereotypical ways to respond to different changes in the environment as a separate entities during PM Assessment.

References:
Autohypnotic Experiences of Milton H. Erickson (Milton H. Erickson and Ernest L. Rossi), The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, July. 1977 20, 36-54, reprinted in Collected Papers Volume 1.
Andre M. Weitzenhoffer (1976) Introduction/forward in Hypnotic Realities Erickson & Rossi
Rosen (1982), My Voice Will Go With You, p. 211.
Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D.C. (2004). Doing Without Schema Hierarchies: A Recurrent Connectionist Approach to Normal and Impaired Routine Sequential Action. Psychological Review, 111(2), 395-429.
Cadieu, C., Kouh, M., Pasupathy, A., Conner, C., Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T.A. (2007). A Model of V4 Shape Selectivity and Invariance. J Neurophysiol, 98, 1733-1750.
Cox, William T. L.; Abramson, Lyn Y.; Devine, Patricia G.; Hollon, Steven D. (2012). “Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Depression: The Integrated Perspective”. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (5): 427–449.
Gorton, Gregg E (2005). Milton Hyland Erickson The American Journal of Psychiatry. Washington. Vol.162, Iss. 7.
Gureckis, T.M., & Love, B.C. (2010) Direct Associations or Internal Transformations? Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying Sequential Learning Behavior. Cognitive Science, 34, 10-50.
Jones, M.N., & Mewhort, D.J.K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1-37.



Please leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.